MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pamela Silvestri <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Mar 2006 16:12:47 EST
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (3183 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
 
I've told my son to use it as a reference tool only and that he needs to  
verify the information with at least 3 other sources. And then if he comes  
across any discrepancies in those...he needs to research this  further. Many of us 
are able to note errors/discrepancies and I want my son  to learn how to 
question 'facts' and develop good critical thinking skills. He's  getting there!
 
Most recently I used Wiki when I was researching these Acts of Congress:  ECW 
(which created the CCC), CWA, WPA and FERA. 
 
In regards to FERA, as an Act of Congress it was the 'Federal Emergency  
Relief Act' (May 1933). Most often, people refer to this act by it's  
administrative name, 'Federal Emergency Relief Administration'. 
 
This is a common 'error'. In fact, I have yet to find any internet resource  
that accurately describes/defines any one or all of these Acts and their 
related  programs/projects. Either the dates are wrong, the Act is confused with a  
program, programs are confused with projects and so on. This is so common and 
 frustrating.
 
As far as dates are concerned, the date the law was enacted and the date  the 
program went into effect are often interchanged.
 
Recently I came across a reference to the WPA as being a successor of FERA!  
And more often than not the CWA is thought of having 'developed'  into the 
WPA...two different programs, created under separate Acts of  Congress. The WPA 
in fact has often been considered as part of Roosevelt's  initial New Deal 
Programs, which were in place during his initial 100 days in  office... and it 
wasn't.
 
I've been rather disappointed to find so many misconstrued facts, etc.,  
especially those pertaining to the CCC. But it's also easy to see how this can  
happen and at times I've also been able to trace back to where these  errors 
occurred too.
 
Before I submit any corrections to Wiki, etc.(and our Museum's brochures!),  
I'll be doing research in the National Archives and relying on primary  
sources!
 
Pam
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 3/3/2006 2:04:56 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

Though  the idea behind Wikapedia is wonderful, I have frequently  found
erroneousinformation in entries.  So I am very hesitant to cite  a Wikapedia 
article
as a source, though atmy daughter's school, teachers  accept Wikapedia 
articles as Internet
references, though mostof them refuse  to accept .com sites!  I found a 
Wikapedia article on John
Rankin and  though itwas well-written and contained no errors, the author had 
used only  ONE
source (which he/she cited, in contrast to many Wikapedia articles I  read).

Susannah West
John Rankin House
Ripley,  Ohio





=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).


ATOM RSS1 RSS2