I agree that the dresses in question are most likely reproductions- or at
worst re-furbished "vintage dresses".

I also agree with the point about being careful of accusations made on the
listserv.  Isabella- did you ask the blogger whether this was a true story
or a creative writing exercise?  There is a link that says, "ask me
anything"...
I remember an instance not too long ago where more serious accusations were
made on the listserv about an unnamed museum on the east coast (which was
readily identifiable with a simple Google search).

I think it bears reminding everyone on *any* public forum that what you post
here is actually public.  Don't say (write) anything that you wouldn't want
printed in the paper or on the evening news.  (I would, by the way, give the
same caution to the blogger who blogs- even in a creative writing format-
about engaging in illegal activities.)
Just my $0.02.
-Cass

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:15 PM, . . <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
>
> Hello!
>
> I'm a long time lurker to the list.  This afternoon, I was looking up
> information on vintage dresses and gowns when I came across this blogger's
> post:
> http://thedarlingsfables.tumblr.com/post/3489854698/a-pair-of-kindred-spirits
> For those that don't like links, it says the following:
>
> *My friend Lesley and I used to work at a museum and one day after work we
> snuck some brilliant dresses off some mannequins and some other props and
> came up with these charming photos. I hope they bring you as much
> satisfaction and longing for summer as they do me.*
>
> The post is accompanied by an array of photos of the two ladies in what are
> clearly late 19th century/early 20th century gowns doing a variety of
> seemingly innocent activities; such as cloud watching in the grass or
> kneeling outside in the grass.  However, those activities are extremely
> damaging to antique cotton and silk gowns not to mention any insects or
> chemicals they may have gotten on them thanks to lawn care.
>
> I would love to believe that she was joking and did have permission -much
> in the same vain as I say when I tell people I'm going to "kidnap" my
> nephew- but I can't imagine a curator allowing someone to lay down outside
> in the grass in an antique dress that is part of the museum's collection.
>
> So, if you all can help ease my mind and tell me she did actually have
> permission to wear the dresses, that would be awesome.  Does anyone even
> recognize the gowns?  I believe the lady lives in Canada but I'm unsure if
> the museum she "borrowed" these dresses from is there.   Does anyone know if
> she had permission or not?  Is the museum even aware of what took place?
>
> If she didn't have permission, how did she manage to get the artifacts out
> of the museum without anyone raising an eyebrow?   I really think this might
> be a larger discussion on museum security and procedures, particularly for
> trusted individuals in the museum.
>
> I really hope someone recognizes the gowns and can help tell me yea or nay
> on whether or not this lady had permission to have those gowns.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Isabella
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the MUSEUM-L list, click the following link:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=MUSEUM-L&A=1
>

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).