Working in both collections and curatorial, I have to agree with a whole
lot of all sides of this. Curators get the attention, glamour and often
donations.

There are many curators out there who have a very sheltered and overly
academic view of their work. We should all be seeking to make the
information MORE accessible, not throwing crap up with no explanation or
opportunity to educate (modern art museums do this far too often for my
taste) and it is what create this elitist aura that turns people away.

Collections people can be so focused on protection that they forget
accessibility and visibility and the usefulness of the artifacts. If a
curator has to unwrap tissue from 100 things time is being wasted an
handling is increased and damage more likely.

Money: I blame the fund raisers for the lack of collections funding, for
failing to see that collections maintenance, tracking and care could be
spun in a way to solicit donations, of stuff if not money. How many of us
could use a donation of shelves from Home Depot or carts from Lowes? How
many donors who really want to help are not being told that such and such
donation will prevent 100 items from being damaged in a flood or from a
mold infestation? Obviously the old systems are not really working, but it
seems no one is really jumping on trying new things.

Also, the refusal and inability to pay living wages, especially to the
people handling the art the most, and needing the most experience and
education, mean every museum has substandard work and staff that cannot get
attached and stay an grow because they cannot afford to. I lost count years
ago of how many hours of work I have had to do in order to fix enormous
mistakes made because museums tried to use unskilled and unpaid and
unsupervised interns in order to save money...

Also, I am currently working for a for profit corporation that looks at the
salary surveys and is thrilled that the pay rates are so low and use that
to justify also keeping their rates insanely low.





On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Brian Rayca <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> In defense of Mike Diaz's point, because I know him and have shared his
> experience.  There are a range of museums out there.  Just as many that
> focus on research and collections care while providing little or no
> interpretation and education.  Stuff just sits in display cases with little
> attention paid how the information is put to the audience.  Little regard
> to the audience.  In a complaint about a label that was written at to  high
> a grade level I heard a curator remark that "if they are to stupid to read
> they shouldn't be here."
>
> So yes, Collections care is important, because without the collection
> there is nothing to interpret, but without interpretation the objects are
> just chachkies collecting dust.
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Sarah LeCount <[log in to unmask]
> > wrote:
>
>> Marc,
>>
>> Thank you for bringing this out, and I agree wholeheartedly. In my career
>> I've seen conservators and curators overworked, underpaid, and their
>> positions left unfilled when they leave an institution. I admire what
>> educators do (goodness knows I haven't the patience for it!) but I feel
>> that the boards and administrators of many museums are forgetting what is
>> important - collections care and preservation, and research - in an effort
>> to get more bodies through the door.
>>
>> Just my 2 cents . . .
>>
>> Sarah
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---- Marc A Williams <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> > Deb, and all,
>> >
>> > If all of us are allowed to gripe for a moment, I would postulate that
>> currently the bottom of the ladder are conservators.  How many small to
>> medium institutions have staff conservators?  Virtually none?  How many
>> such institutions would have anything to educate about if they did not have
>> collections or historic buildings?  Why is preservation of such historic
>> assets near the bottom of their agendas?  Everything lasts forever without
>> planning and preservation actions?  In this era of digital collections, it
>> just might be possible to have a "museum" without a collection.  But is
>> this what most institutions want?  I was trained in the 1970s as a
>> conservator.  In the nearly 40 years since then, there has been very, very
>> little movement in museums/institutions hiring conservators on staff.  ALL
>> museum professionals are having a hard time gaining employment, partially
>> due to too many training opportunities being offered at all the
>> universities/colleges across the country without consideration for the
>> number of potential jobs.  However, the number of conservation training
>> venues has remained fairly constant, excepting paper/library/archival
>> programs, which have been a bit exuberant.  But, not that many more
>> conservators are on staff at institutions.  Why?  Every survey that has
>> ever been done indicates that preservation in our institutions is severely
>> neglected at best.  And in smaller institutions, it is nearly non-existent.
>> >
>> > I suggest that every institution advocate for preservation of their
>> collections, whether objects or architecture.  And I mean REAL advocacy,
>> not an occasional mention.  With real physical objects being preserved,
>> institutions can educate and tie their collections to their local history.
>>  Without them, can they still do this?  Will a "collection" with virtual
>> objects be the same?  Advocacy for preservation generates interest and
>> excitement and a growth of the perceived need for educators, curators, and
>> museum administrators.  And this leads to jobs and perceived worth.  What
>> is the base of the pyramid, and what is the top?
>> >
>> > Marc
>> >
>> > American Conservation Consortium, Ltd.
>> >      4 Rockville Road
>> >      Broad Brook, CT 06016
>> >      www.conservator.com
>> >      860-386-6058
>> >
>> > Marc A. Williams, President
>> >      MS in Art Conservation, Winterthur Museum Program
>> >      Former Chief Wooden Objects Conservator, Smithsonian Institution
>> >      Fellow, American Institute for Conservation (AIC)
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >
>>
>> =========================================================
>> Important Subscriber Information:
>>
>> The Museum-L FAQ file is located at
>> http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed
>> information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail
>> message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should
>> read "help" (without the quotes).
>>
>> If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to
>> [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read
>> "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the MUSEUM-L list, click the following link:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-HOME.exe?SUBED1=MUSEUM-L&A=1
>

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).