MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Wayne E. Wakefield" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 1994 15:25:10 EST
Comments:
Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2
Reply-To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
I am on a task force at the National Museum of American History trying to
define what the minimum amount of documentation is needed to make our objects
useful to the telling of our story. What do you in the field consider the
minimum? What is the "practical ideal." Does information storage technology
have an impact on the data collected? How far beyond administrative and
descriptive data should we go in documenting a historic object? What is the
best means of making this collected documentation accessible to the museum's
staff, scholars and the public? What forms might this documentation take?
Photographs? digital images? Letters? Journal articles? Catalog worksheets?
Computer files?
 
Any answers?
 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      NMAH,  Dept. of the History of Science & Technology
          Phone: (202) 357-2314    NMAH 5119, MRC 638
                   Send E-Mail!  It's faster!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2