MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Tichgelaar <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 Oct 2012 23:18:10 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2829 bytes) , text/html (7 kB)
My rule of thumb has been that if the parts can function separately, each
gets a number.  A cup and saucer would each get a number.  But two things
that are used as a whole object with detachable parts (teapot and lid) get
-a and -b numbers.  I would number your set as:

 

.First cup:   1998-00005-001 

.First saucer:   1998-00005-002 

.Second cup:   1998-00005-003 

.Second saucer:   1998-00005-004 

.Pot:   1998-00005-005a 

.Cover:   1998-00005-005b





 

From: Museum discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Juetian Luo
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 10:53 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [MUSEUM-L] Whole or Parts number?

 

Hello to all (Registrars especially),

I would like to seek your advise on the following:
We are trying to come up with some good guiding principle on when we should
assign Part Accession Numbers and when we should assign Whole Accession
Numbers to things. E.g., when assigning accession numbers to a teapot set
consisting of 2 sets of cup and saucer and a pot with cover, we would assign
in the following manner.

.First cup:   1998-00005-001 

.First saucer:   1998-00005-002 

.Second cup:   1998-00005-003 

.Second saucer:   1998-00005-004 

.Pot:   1998-00005-005 

.Cover:   1998-00005-006 



However, the marrying of items may sometimes be subjective and context
dependent. e.g., if a jacket is always worn with a particular dress by this
donor, and the curator decides to put them together as a "default" set, do
we then assign each item a whole number or the set as a whole number with
parts (i.e., the jacket is part 1, and the dress part 2)? How things could
come together extrinsically can sometimes be very subjective, such as the
jacket and the dress. The topic was debated at great length at our meeting.

Other controversial cases would be photos in an album for example.

Does any of you have any such written "numbering" guidelines that we can
follow? Basically, we are trying to articulate the rationale of how we
should assign numbers so that we can do it in some consistent manner.

I am desperate for some good advice!
Thanks in advance. 

  _____  

To unsubscribe from the MUSEUM-L list, click the following link:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-HOME.exe?SUBED1=MUSEUM-L
<http://home.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-HOME.exe?SUBED1=MUSEUM-L&A=1> &A=1 


=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).


ATOM RSS1 RSS2