MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Cheryl Musch <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Dec 1996 19:23:23 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
I'm currently working with a small museum on a permanent exhibit.  They're
wondering if there's a cheaper way than shooting a negative and printing a
photo to enlarge photos for exhibits.  They suggested possibly scanning
photos into a computer or using color xeroxing.  To me, xeroxing sounds
unacceptable conservationally.  Does anyone have any experience with cheaper
alternative methods of reproducing photographs?
===============
Cheryl Musch
Museum Consultant
Museum of Anthropology
University of Kansas
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2