MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
HHS Director <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:12:43 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (7 kB) , text/html (19 kB)
We get the “are there ghosts in this house?” question all the time.

 

Our answer: “Why of course, dozens of them.” Yes, it’s flip, but it helps end the discussion. 

 

Until our ghosts are willing to sit down and do an oral history with my staff, however, I’m not willing to spend the money spying on them.

 

 

Suzanne Buchanan

Hingham Historical Society

www.hinghamhistorical.org

 

From: Museum discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Christian Darkin
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2012 4:38 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MUSEUM-L] Paranormal Investigations in Museums and Historic Sites online course begins September 17

 

Hi

As far as I know there's no law of conservation of data otherwise we wouldn't need museums.  Conservation of energy, yes, but data needs work If you want it kept. 

Christian darkin

Twitter: @Christiandarkin

Www.anachronistic.co.uk

 

Sent from my iPod


On 9 Sep 2012, at 02:02, Randy Little <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

 



The Absence of  <http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/the-absence-of-proof-is-not-proof-of-absence> Proof Is Not Proof of Absence!   

The use of the terms supernatural are just to define things that people would seem to be beyond that natural.   This could be determined at some point to not be the case and that the energy of life exist beyond the body.   This could be extrapolated from the theories that science already investigates such as that we are nothing more then a 3d project of 2d date that exist on the interior of black holes when they swollow items.   The rules of conservation of data say that data can not be destroyed.   Thus This data in the black whole creates basically holographic worlds inside the black whole from data that has been swallowed.   So its quit possible that we dont' even actually exist and are nothing more then that projection with ZERO way to know the difference of whether we are the original or the 3d projection of the 2d data spattered on the inside of the black whole.    Doubt me?   


Crazy technical version of holographic Principle  
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle

easier but still mind numbing discovery channel version.  
http://news.discovery.com/space/are-we-living-in-a-hologram.html

So you can't just deny that the "super natural" exist because we don't even know now if we actually exist.   


Randy S. Little


http://www.rslittle.com <http://reel.rslittle.com> 

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2325729/

 





On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Stephen Nowlin <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

 

Very thoughtful comments, Jerry, thanks. 

 

I would only invite further discussion of the notion that museums might venture into "what we do NOT know as well as what we believe we DO." 

 

I don't disagree with you, but would only suggest a possible further distinction. A space museum might well have a display that speculates about the uncertain physics within a black hole, thus acknowledging a core principle of science -- which is that there are things we don't know and what we do know is always subject to revision. But in such a case, knowing "what we don't know" is an informed concept. I would be surprised to hear of a space museum whose display on black holes speculated that what we don't know about them might be explained by paranormal or supernatural phenomena at work, and thus justification for partnering with a group that has invented a specious pseudo-scientific means of investigating such a possibility. 

 

On the other hand, I can imagine that a space museum might host a program in which ancient human beliefs in a supernaturally explained cosmos might be examined as interesting and informative cultural artifact. I think the same distinction should guide the actions of a cultural history museum — as in the case of Shaker beliefs, the museum should serve its audience by examining those beliefs as cultural artifact and not in a way, by virtue of a dubious partnership with paranormal groups, that implies the museum's endorsement of current pseudo-science.

 

/stephen

 

 

From: "jerry.symonds" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Saturday, September 8, 2012 10:24 AM
To: Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [MUSEUM-L] Paranormal Investigations in Museums and Historic Sites online course begins September 17

 

Dear Stephen,

 

I do agree with you that the kind of shows you mention are distinctly “sensational” and museums and heritage sites need to very careful about compromising their own integrity when and if approached to take part in such programmes. 

 

However, I think it’s also important that we are not seen to be ‘precious’. Magical belief systems, after all, have been around since the beginning of time and indeed many museums hold artifacts which reflect the material culture surrounding the unknown, mystical and surreal. So, if we are the custodians of both tangible and intangible heritage, then I don’t personally have a problem with engagement in the margins of the unknown – as long as we don’t make claims we cannot substantiate.

 

I also agree that the name “museum” implies all the things you mention although “disciplined objectivity” presumably can allow for the consideration of what we do NOT know as well as what we believe we DO?

 

I also believe that “museum” and “entertainment” can share a happy middle ground although I am with you that in matters of the paranormal this can be dangerous territory! I appreciate that entertainment in museums (or not!) is a whole discussion thread in its own right!

 

These are my own views and not necessarily those of my employers, so I’ll just sign myself “Jerry” today!

 

Kind Regards,

 

Jerry

 

 

  _____  

To unsubscribe from the MUSEUM-L list, click the following link:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-HOME.exe?SUBED1=MUSEUM-L <http://home.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-HOME.exe?SUBED1=MUSEUM-L&A=1> &A=1 

 

  _____  

To unsubscribe from the MUSEUM-L list, click the following link:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-HOME.exe?SUBED1=MUSEUM-L <http://home.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-HOME.exe?SUBED1=MUSEUM-L&A=1> &A=1 

 

  _____  

To unsubscribe from the MUSEUM-L list, click the following link:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-HOME.exe?SUBED1=MUSEUM-L <http://home.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-HOME.exe?SUBED1=MUSEUM-L&A=1> &A=1 


=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).


ATOM RSS1 RSS2