MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Indianapolis Art Center <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 May 1996 19:38:44 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
 Discuss on
>Museum-L of the pitfalls and methods of existing systems would be
>appreciated.

I'd like to know too!  In business school we were always taught that
subordinates reviewing supervisors was not a good idea, but that a
peer-level review system was very workable and has been done.  I guess a
recent graduate-level personnel management textbook might have what you're
looking for.

While we have no formal bottom-up evaluation system, we do have some
structure in the annual performance review that allows the person being
reviewed to let the supervisor know what he/she can do (the supervisor) to
make the reviewee's job easier, more effective, more efficient, whatever, on
a regular basis.

Julia Muney Moore
Director of Exhibitions and Artist Services
Indianapolis Art Center

ATOM RSS1 RSS2