I'm absolutely dead tired, and I will probably regret writing this, but
even through the fog logic says that any standard assignment/acquisition of copyright agreement would work -- as long as the term "sole and exclusive right" is used instead of "non-exclusive,"  and the type of reproductions intended to be produced are specified.

-------------------------------------
amalyah keshet
head of visual resources / the israel museum, jerusalem
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
date: 08/18/97
visit our web site at http://www.imj.org.il
-------------------------------------



On Fri, 15 Aug 1997 09:11:19 -0500  Dean, Patty wrote:
>Greetings Colleagues! Does anyone out there have a sample or boilerplate
>of an exclusivee licensing agreement they've negotiated with a copyright
>holder they could fax or e-mail me? Our institution is planning to
>reproduce some Modernist architect-designed furniture in our collection.
> The architects (who donated the furniture) retained copyright interests
>& all parties involved wish our institution to have sole/exclusive
>reproduction rights to the objects.  So, the standard non-exclusive
>license agreement many art museums use when they acquire an artist's
>work won't work in this case. I appreciate any help you all can give me!
>Thanks in advance!
>Patty Dean
>Supervisory Curator
>Museum Collections Dept.
>Minnesota Historical Society
>345 Kellogg Boulevard West
>St. Paul, MN  55102-1906 USA
>
>E-mail:  [log in to unmask]
>Phone:  612-297-7444
>FAX:  612-297-2967
>