MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Siobhan Starrs <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 08:38:44 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (98 lines)
Actually, copyright and licencing of exhibits is a concern my office is currently deliberating. We are developing an exhibit design (that incorporates a specific technological system including computer-based and plasma screen technology) that we would like to offer to other museums as a prototype that they could adopt in whole, or in part, to fit their needs and their audience. In my research, I have come across several museums and science centers that create exhibit designs, or technological systems, and then sell these components to other museums or science centers. So, copyright or licencing of exhibits is a relevant issue. Many smaller museums do not have the infrastructure to build elaborate displays and cannot afford costly design/fabrication firms. It seems as if museums and other educational organizations can offer exhibit concepts and designs to each other at significantly reduced costs or even with some in-kind relationship.  Obviously there are obstacles and can be drawbacks to this approach, but it is an interesting idea.

Regards,
Siobhan Starrs

Siobhan Starrs
Forces of Change Program
National Museum of Natural History
p: 202/357-4680/ f: 202/786-2567


>>> [log in to unmask] 02/28/01 06:34PM >>>
Believe me the exhibit itself should be enough to copyright the exhibit.  Just because it is taken down does not effect this.  What is important however is that you really do not have to register a copyright unless you are bringing an action in court.  You recieve copyright
protection once it is in tangible form.  If you are going to register the exhibit you are correct that some record of it must be submitted.   BUt registering the exhibit it probably a waste of time and resources, I can see almost no reason to do so.

As for who would own the exhibit, that is a work for hire argument and should be left for another day since explaining it can cause headaches.  And I also like Brian Dennehy.


Steven Bush

Albert Sperath wrote:

> Steven Bush wrote:
>
> >I think that the exhibit it self is a tangible form.  I do not think you
> >need to write out >the design or anything, a tangible form is a tangible
> >form.
>
> I respectfully disagree. The exhibition I pictured was a temporary one even
> if a long term installation and will eventually disappear. Without a
> tangible document like a plan, file or photographs there will be no
> evidence of it for ©. To register it in Washington it there must be
> tangible evidence submitted with the application.
>
> Adrienne DeAngelis wrote:
>
> >Exhibitions are the work of many people, usually both
> >inside and outside of the exhibiting insititution.  To whom would such a
> >copyright on the whole exhibition belong?
>
> My understanding is it would be the museum that they work for. Regardless
> of whether they were in the direct employ of the museum or  contract
> designers (work for hire).
>
> >Finally, what earthly purpose would be served by trying to
> >copyright an entire exhibition?
>
> The original question from Pamela Feltus was:
>
> >Has anyone ever had, or heard of, an exhibit copyrighted or anything like
> >that for the protection of intellectual property?
>
> The answer is simply yes it can be ©ed and Ms. Feltus can tell us what
> brought this inquiry to the list.
>
> >It would seem that Mr. Sperath has seen
> >"The Belly of an Architect" (where an exhibition planned by one man is
> >hijacked by others in a money-laundering scheme) too many times.
>
> BTW, Brian Dennehy is one of my favorite actors and it is impossible to see
> his films too many  times.
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> Albert Sperath
>
> Albert Sperath, Director
> University Art Galleries
> Murray State University
> 604 Fine Arts Center
> Murray KY 42071-3342
>
> 270.762.6734 voice
>               3920 fax
>
> This is a personal message.  The views expressed in this message are solely
> those of the sender and are not to be attributed to the owner of the
> sender's domain, the sender's employer or any other person.
>
> Important Subscriber Information:
>
> The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
>
> If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

========================================================Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2