ICOM-L Archives

International Council of Museums Discussion List

ICOM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mario Bucolo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
International Council of Museums Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:33:50 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (84 lines)
On 25-08-2005 12:57, "P Boylan" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Mario Bucolo wrote:
> 
> +++++ [CLIP] +++++
> 
>> Last week I meet, informally, in Paris the ICOM General Secretary and we
>> talk about this idea. He was happy about this initiative and he want to look
>> again to the proposal after a better definition about who will join the
>> group, the group goals and strategic plan to achieve the goals.
>> He was very clear that the creation of a new International Committees inside
>> ICOM it will be difficult (also regarding burocracy) and with long times
>> (about Vienna 2007 general assembly).
> 
> =================
> 
> Mario:
> 
> Please remember that if your suggested Group is eventually constituted as
> an official ICOM International Committee any "younger" ICOM member joining
> it would not be allowed to be a full ("voting") member in any other
> International Committee, such as the International Committee for their own
> academic or professional specialisation (ICME, Nat Hist, CECA, ICMS or
> whatever). (This is clear under the Statutes and Rules of ICOM, which
> allow full membership in only one International Committee at a time.)
> 
> I am sure that nobody - least of all the younger members - would want to
> cut themselves off from perhaps more senior professional colleagues in
> their own specialisation in this way, so some other structure would be
> needed.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Patrick Boylan
> 

This another good reason to create an independent group,
but on the other hand why you think that further members of YPC ICOM (if
after all proceeding will be create) don't prefer to can vote in that
committee and not in other committee where the activity is zero or near to
be null? One of the reason to create a YPC (or any name can it have) is the
low level of activities and interaction and usefulness of many committee
where members are not happy.
You say:
>" would want to cut themselves off from perhaps more senior professional
>colleagues in their own specialisation in this way"

This is right and this is one of the main goals of a committees. But it is
still true? How many committee are real active in this sense?
I'm a voting (voting? What?) of MPR from 6 months before Seoul conference.
Until today I receive only 3 email from MPR and all are only to announce the
annual meeting in Finland, no news, no professional information. I'm also
member of other committee...but I don't remember witch they are because I
never receive any communication from them!
My original proposal was oriented to create an ICOM committee because I
trust in the ICOM mission and I'm  very deluse (as many other colleagues)
about lack created from other persons.

Mario Bucolo

-- 
Mario Bucolo, ABIS MultiCom & Museumland CEO
Skype user: mariobucolo

Visit http://www.museumland.net
The WorldWide Portal to museums and cultural heritage

CulturMed Conference
http:// www.culturmed.info

ABIS MultiCom S.r.l. - Multimedia & Communication
Via Milano n.61 - 95127 Catania - Italy
Ph: +39-095-38.70.92
Ph: +39-02-38596640
No fax, just email!
Email: [log in to unmask]
Http://www.abis.it

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Change ICOM-L subscription options, unsubscribe, and search the
archives at:  http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/icom-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2