In article <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask] (John Leeke) wrote: > > Dr. Rot: > > Your product comparison testing (at your website) was interesting and would > even be useful if you listed the actual products used in the comparison. > Without that information the comparison does little to help us understand the > characterists of your product base on our understanding of the other products > out on the market. > > How about providing us with the names of the products used? > > John Leeke, Preservation Consultant > 26 Higgins St., Portland, ME 04103, USA > 207 773-2306 > Old-House Journal, Contributing Editor > Practical Restoration Reports, Publisher > www.housenet.com/HistoricHomeWorks/index.htm > > John: Your request is well taken. There were *management* decisions that said not to make the product names integral with the test section. But here they are: Product A was Arbatron's *Liquid Wood* and product B was Boatlife's *Git-Rot*. The base standard epoxy resin was West with a slow hardner. There are other *wood-hardners* out there but it our humble opinion that a premmium epoxy product is required for strength and long-term stability. We'd be happy to answer any addition questions, or respond to comments. The Rot Doctor http://www.rotdoctor.com E-mail: [log in to unmask] Phone: 206 783 0307 Fax: 206 783 0582 -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading