I fail to see the problem with this. What is so wrong with duplication of slides of conservation work. If this is an employee of the Museum, wouldn't it seem only fair that they be able to take advantage of this research? Perhaps I am unclear as to what "personal use" constitutes in this case. I am assuming that they are not selling these images or offering them for publications outside their own work. Do I missunderstand? Museums are in the business of offering research to many people. At our Museum, this means supplying slides at a nominal fee to a variety of people for a variety of reasons--of course, with an agreement as to how they will be used. John Handley San Francisco