The gallery in which I currently work uses a democratic system for jurying
artwork. In this system, a staff of five rates each piece from one to
five.  Five being the best, one being the worst.  This is a quick way to
get everyone's opinion on about 200 works in a 2-3 hour period, but it
doesn't leave much room for critical analysis or discussion among members
of the jury.  Does anyone have any suggestions or methods of group jurying
and/or group curating that are both thorough and efficient?

Deborah Bain
Student Center Art Gallery
SFSU, San Francisco, CA