Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jan 1999 11:51:22 -0800 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Deb, You've given me quite a bit to think about. Since the museum
where I currently work is on the UIC campus, I have easy access (and it's
free!) to both the Education Dept. here and the Masters in the Teaching of
History program here. Since I know some of our professors here at UIC, it
certainly seems worthwhile to at least start talking to them and get a feel
for their responsiveness.
Thanks for taking the time to reply. I truely appreciate your suggestions.
Peggy Glowacki
At 09:34 AM 1/28/1999 -0500, you wrote:
>At 10:10 AM 1/27/99 -0800, you wrote:
>>Hi, Does anyone have information about or opinions of the relative merits
>>of Distance Education programs in Museum Studies? I have worked in a small
>>museum for 9 years and am thinking of going back for a second MA (my first
>>was in American history) but cannot relocate. There are no Museum Studies
>>programs in the Chicago area
>
>I'm sure there is a university in the Chicago area that has a graduate
>general education program. Granted it will be for classroom teachers but
>you can probably get out of the M.Ed. without student teaching if you
>explain to the dean that you are a museum person. And even if you do have
>to student teach, it's good experience to be on "the other side of the
>desk" for a time.
>
>The educational theory will all be the same and the extra work in the
>classrooms is emensely beneficial because you will have to work with kids
>in a school classroom and deal with the limitations of the classroom as a
>museum educator. This is critical information to know and understand when
>working in a museum ed program. I've seen far too many good museum ed
>programs that are almost completely useless because the museum educators
>who prepared them did not understand what the needs and abilties of a
>classroom teacher are. Most of it was due to the follow-up activities that
>were either over the teacher's heads in subject matter and thus they
>couldn't explain the lessons to their students, required materials and
>activities that were not available or feasible in a classroom or just took
>too long to do. Nature lessons that need a field or patch of woods are no
>good in a city. Art activties that require lots of clean-up and
set-up or
>special materials are impossible to do in a school with no extra rooms to
>use or art teacher to order special supplies.
>
>A traditional ed grad program will also help you understand how state
>curriculums work and what pressures teachers are to teach these
>curriculums. Any outside info that teachers can use with minimal effort on
>their part are always greatly appreciated. If you know what the teachers
>have to teach and how they have to teach it, you can look at your museum
>program and create curriculum that teachers can use. A unit on modern art
>for 5th graders is useless to a teacher who has to teach Renaissance
>history. A unit on how lifestyles and social attitudes are reflected
>through art in the Renaissance for 5th graders would be perfect.
>
>Lastly, a general ed program will give you experience and knoweldge of how
>to teach all subjects, not just the one your museum is about. Curriculums
>these days are "multi-disciplinary", meaing that lessons generally don't
>focus on one subject but incorporate several subjects. The book "Island of
>the Blue Dolphins" can be used not only for reading/language arts but for
>science math and history. Learning how to incorporate more than one
>subject area in a lesson is a valuable skill because the more SOLs a
>teacher can cover in a lesson, the easier her job is.
>
>Good luck!
>
>Deb
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------
>Staples & Charles Ltd.
>225 N Fairfax St.
>Alexandria, VA 22314
>USA
>703-683-0900 - voice
>703-683-2820 - fax
>[log in to unmask]
>
>
|
|
|