Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - MUSEUM-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
MUSEUM-L Home MUSEUM-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Web databases - the other consideration
From:
Adrienne Deangelis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Jan 1999 12:52:35 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (12 lines)
Hello--it does seem that the problem with the thefts mentioned is more a
lack of supervision and poor management than one of excessive information.
It also seems to me that if full information about a museum's holdings
were easily available the victimized museum would be able to provide
enough details about the lost objects to seriously crimp resale efforts by
the thieves.
        Is there any proof to the long-cited claim that museum holdings
are often stolen to order?  Any cases that can be cited?

        Adrienne DeAngelis
        [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV