Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 3 Dec 1998 09:31:18 -0800 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
It is a regrettable fact but a fact nonetheless that using almost any kind
of artifact or collection object also uses it up. Some media, such as oil
painting, are remarkably enduring and give conservators little tsuris;
others such as anything on paper hate exactly the light that make them
visible. Curators know that every minute of exposure, and the better lit
the worse, of a watercolor today is a minute denied future generations.
Display of anything entails probabilistic risk of theft, damage, etc. The
economics of finite natural resources, which attends to the rate at which
things should be _ used up_, a rate that is never zero, apply to museum
collections, and the implications are unsettling to curators whose
professional culture is to save and protect stuff.
|
|
|