Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - MUSEUM-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
MUSEUM-L Home MUSEUM-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Blockbuster Definition
From:
Pamela Sezgin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 9 Jan 1999 00:06:02 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
To David,

The use of technology is important for blockbuster exhibits that are of a
historical or ethnographic nature.  You cannot define all museum exhibits in
terms of just art exhibits.   The use of cutting edge or new technologies adds
to the cachet as does the expense factor.   It gives these exhibits a somewhat
sensational aspect.  "Blockbusters" have more of the attraction rather than
the academic orientation
of museum exhibits.

Small exhibits may be very important in terms of their audience impact.  What
separates "blockbusters" is that they are intended to attract large audiences.
And yes,  some "blockbusters" do "bomb" and do not attract the intended number
of visitors -- e.g., "Versailles" this past summer in Jackson, MS, and a
touring Russian exhibit that "bombed" in Cobb County (north of Atlanta)
although the artifacts were exceptional and the display was not bad.

pamela sezgin

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV