Deb -

Thanks for bringing up this interesting topic.

I'm one of those who went straight from undergraduate work into a Museum
Studies program.  I would have to agree that an educator needs background in
both subject matter and instructional technique.  When I entered the Museum
Studies program, I wanted to continue taking art history/studio classes in
order to keep my knowledge and skill sharp in those subject areas, and I felt
I needed more "real world" experience in education.  However, time and money
dictated that I adhere to the degree requirements as closely as possible.
While I was earning my undergraduate degree in art history/education, I
conducted an internship teaching art in public schools.  The Museum Studies
graduate program helped me learn new techniques for teaching and providing
educational experiences to different audiences in both formal and informal
situations.  I could not have gained this invaluable knowledge in my
undergraduate courses which focused mainly on structured classtime for K-12.
However, after I earned my degree, I felt somewhat distanced from the art
background that inspired my desire to earn a degree in museum education in the
first place.  Needless to say, I've been brushing up!

Eighteen months out of grad school and only part-time, temporary jobs to put
on my resume.  Yes, experience counts for something.  But, if we all had the
resources, we could all go to school full-time and volunteer our discretionary
hours away.  One other thing I learned from the very beginning of my graduate
studies....  museum professionals very rarely land their dream job right out
of school.  So, I've come to terms with the reality of doing somewhat-related
work while I personally pursue professional development to bring me closer to
my goals.

Now, I'd call that fair and middle of the road.

Another Deb(orah) Bain



Deb Fuller wrote:

> Why are advanced degrees required?
>