Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 24 Nov 1998 17:14:45 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
You might want to contact the Museum Computer Network. I believe they are a
division of the Amercian Association of Museums.
At 04:33 PM 11/24/98 -0500, you wrote:
>I am a graduate student working on a thesis topic and need help from
>msuem professionals. I would appreciate comments.
>
>Thesis statement:
>
>Small museums have computers -- many acquired randomly,
>not systematically. This raises the question, how can museums
>organize and centralize information systems, how do they make
>decisions regarding the use of technology, and how can museum
>staff understand the impact on their institution. I propose a planning
>process for small museums to determine how to use technology for
>more efficient and ineffective internal communication. This process
>might culminate in the hiring of an IS manager to maintain, overseeing,
>develop/evolve this technology as the museum grows and technology changes.
>
>
>Your comments on the previous and following statements/questions
>would be appreciated:
> There are many nonprofits that do have jerry-mandered,
> out of date systems and don't have the resources or skills
> to replace them or develop a system for evaluating them.
>
> The big challenge is always funding--money is very, very
> hard for infrastructure.
>
> Are there still directors of small museums who are resistant
> to what technology can do for them? Consensus is that pretty
> much everyone agrees on the merits of information systems.
>
> Who would be the decision maker on how to go about
> integrating or acquiring technology, the director?
>
> The feeling that an analysis of what can be done, rather than
> a need to convince people that it needs to be done would
> be useful.
>
>My current thinking is to stick to the "how to" analyze the current state
>of affairs and oppose the "why."
>
>My interest is in small museums with staff under fifty.
>
>Thanks
>
|
|
|