Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 20 Nov 1998 19:09:08 -0800 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Check out the Cultural Resources Management program at the University of
Victoria http://www.uvcs.uvic.ca./crmp.
-----Original Message-----
From: Aspen Historical Society <[log in to unmask]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.museum-l
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Friday, November 20, 1998 12:54 PM
Subject: Continuing Education
> There has been alot of discussion on the List about having a
Master's
>degree; its value, its ramifications, etc. Here is my dilemma. I have a
>B.A. but have been working in a rapidly growing museum for eight years and
>am now overseeing several staff members with M.A.s. I would like to
>continue my education but do not necessarily want to do a correspondence
>M.A. program because the generalized learning (say in history) that I would
>gain would not really pertain to my job. Are there other museum people in
>this same dilemma? Is there a need for a professional development program,
>possibly administrated by the AAM or the AASLH that would allow people
>currently working in museums to gain a "certificate." This type of
>education could be in the form of a one week seminar or by internet
>correspondence. There could be several focuses such as basic conservation,
>overseeing docent programs, publications, exhibit writing, etc., etc.
> With the emerging importance of Master's level educations in the
museum
>field, a program like this would allow working people to "keep up," and it
>would allow people to more easily shift their focus within the museum
>field, say from registrar to curation (which is what happened in my case).
>I'm just curious if there would be a demand for this type of thing. Please
>respond to List.
>
>Lisa Hancock, Curator
>Aspen Historical Society
>
|
|
|