Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 2 Jul 1998 17:21:34 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 04:26 PM 07/02/1998 +0100, you wrote:
>I've heard very recently that access has some internal problems coping with
>the millenium bug (even the most recent version).
>Is this a rumour that anyone else has heard? Or are we all figuring it
>won't matter because the electricity companies won't be supplying because
>they can't cope either?
Microsoft claims that Access 2.0, 95, and 97 all are year-2000 compliant if
4-digit years are used, but that Access 2.0 is not compliant if 2-digit
dates are used. We've tested Access 97 fairly rigorously, and found that
it functions just as Microsoft describes. Its handling of 2-digit years is
a tad complicated, and Access 95's is even more so, so it probably is best
to stick with 4 digits. Microsoft provides extensive info on Year 2000
issues affecting all their products at:
http://www.microsoft.com/ithome/topics/year2k/product/product.htm
**********************************************************************
Melissa C. Winans, Senior LAN Administrator ([log in to unmask])
Texas Memorial Museum Phone: 512-232-4263, 471-1604
V.P. Lab, J.J. Pickle Research Campus Fax: 512-471-5973
University of Texas, 10100 Burnet Road, Austin, TX 78758-4445
|
|
|