Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 14 Jan 1999 10:41:55 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree with Rax wholeheartedly!
"That has been my general take on blockbuster shows ever since.
They offer
the public a superficial experience and the opportunity to buy souvenirs
and tell their friends that they've been to a trendy popular event. For
the
museum administration, they draw crowds, make money and attract
benefactors. Of course, the fact that blockbuster shows are also a pain
for
the staff and take time away from the daily operations is irrelevant in
the
context of the museum as a corporation."
I'm from Washington, DC and the museums of art are virtually empty in
comparison to the history and technological museums until...........the
opening of a blockbuster!
In the 1980's I waited in a line for 8 hours (!) to see the Matisse
exhibit. Geesh, it was hardly worth it! I was so tired and cranky that
I couldn't enjoy the overcrowded show or 'experience' the works.
Ever since then, I pick and choose. I saw the Vermeer show but there was
no way on earth that I would go any where near the recent Van Gogh
exhibit! What a shame!
Monifa
___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
|
|
|