Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - MUSEUM-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
MUSEUM-L Home MUSEUM-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Visitors vs. Curators-afterthought
From:
Michael O'Hare <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Dec 1998 09:31:18 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
It is a regrettable fact but a fact nonetheless that using almost any kind
of artifact or collection object also uses it up.  Some media, such as oil
painting, are remarkably enduring and give conservators little tsuris;
others such as anything on paper hate exactly the light that make them
visible.  Curators know that every minute of exposure, and the better lit
the worse, of a watercolor today is a minute denied future generations.
Display of anything entails probabilistic risk of theft, damage, etc.  The
economics of finite natural resources, which attends to the rate at which
things should be _ used up_, a rate that is never zero, apply to museum
collections, and the implications are unsettling to curators whose
professional culture is to save and protect stuff.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV