Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 20 Nov 1998 16:03:44 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854";
x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" |
Organization: |
Drayton Hall--National Trust |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Christen,
Interesting, but what's your source? Still could be a guide myth without
something to back it up.
"Christen E. Runge" wrote:
> Well, no neat stories, but a little bit of truth.
>
> Closets were indeed sometimes taxed--as rooms. Your tax was determined by
> the number of rooms in your house. There were also additional taxes for
> certain luxury items such as mirrors and chandeliers. Whether closets were
> counted as rooms or not, or taxed or not, varied by locality.
>
> Mainly, old houses lack closets simply because the idea hadn't caught on
> yet. People used furniture for storage (chests, wardrobes, etc.). The
> pantries, buttries and other walk-in service areas of large old houses
> gradually evolved into the closets for personal storage use, but not really
> until the turn of this century.
>
> Christen Runge
> [log in to unmask]
--
Wade Lawrence
Asst. Director, Drayton Hall
National Trust for Historic Preservation
web: www.draytonhall.org
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|