Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 11 Mar 1998 20:54:12 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The concept of a redefinition of the term "museum" is an important one
to consider. Disney, whether or not you feel they represent the
antichrist of museums, markets their Club Disney (for children and
fammilies) alternately as a children's museum or a science center,
depending on the research data on potential audiences. Disney may not be
preserving truth and history - but society has begun to accept this
definition of "museum", and will continue to do so in growing numbers.
We can beat them at their own game with real collections and
intellectual content, or we can stand by our horses, damning the first
wave of cars coming down the road.
****************************************
D. Neil Bremer
Bremer Communications
Image & Communication Skills for Business
[log in to unmask]
http://www.BremerCommunications.com
(708) 848-5945 Office
(708) 848-6011 Fax
Ross Weeks wrote:
>
> John's posting is rather strident in tone. Museum folk may be guilty of
> "deciding" what's "right" for the public to learn from their institutions,
> but that's not redefinition. But the definition of the word "museum" has
> been expanded so dramatically in the last couple of decades that it has lost
> its meaning. I have no bone to pick with the institutions that were once
> just "halls of fame," or "art exhibit galleries," (even zoos) but they are
> now "museums" for AAM purposes.
>
|
|
|