In a message dated 11/3/98 12:03:32 PM regarding the Van Gogh exhibit,
[log in to unmask] wrote:

>You are allowed four tickets per person (it was six but changed because
scalpers >were abusing the system).


I have a possible debate question for the list: Is it "abusing the system" if
someone chooses to stand in line for hours in order to receive free tickets,
which will later be sold, or is it a legitimate way to make a buck? After all,
a LOT of people would rather just pay for a ticket rather than wait for hours
in the cold to see the show. Isn't the service provided (waiting in line)
worth a service fee?

If this is "abuse," should national museums like the National Gallery of Art
charge admission for blockbuster shows to avoid this "abuse"? After all, when
the show moves to California (L.A.?) next year, those patrons will pay for the
privilege of seeing the same show.

Popular opinion seems to be against the scalpers, but they're in line like
everyone else. They're not getting an unfair advantage. So why are some so
upset at what appears to be a beautiful example of capitalism and the free
market system?

Jane McKee
[log in to unmask]