MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"William A. Eastman" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 1998 22:34:13 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (18 lines)
In response to the posts by recent museum studies grads who believe that
their programs of study were "intellectually lightweight"...

I'm inclined to wonder if perhaps these individuals chose the wrong
program. After all "museum studies" programs, like museums themselves, are
quite diverse. Rather than categorically dismissing the whole discipline,
as Ross Weeks seems bent on doing, I think this discussion would be better
served by pointing to specific deficiencies

I graduated in May from George Washington U's museum studies program, and
I am very satisfied with my education. The program and degree helped me
land a job doing exactly what I want to do - but that's not the only
reason I'm satisfied. The program also enriched my life. Yes, I said
enriched. Then again, grad school is what you make of it. Teachers can
only really challenge you to a certain extent. The rest is up to you.

William Eastman

ATOM RSS1 RSS2