Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - MUSEUM-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
MUSEUM-L Home MUSEUM-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: questions on posted jobs
From:
Ross Weeks <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 Jan 1998 10:20:33 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
The question is raised about why so many museum job postings allow very
little time for someone to submit an application, and the anticipated
"start date" for the successful applicant isn't mentioned.

Are many, if not most, of these postings simply an effort by the museums to
be able to verify that their openings were "advertised" widely in the
effort to seek non-traditional applicants, i.e., to comply with affirmative
action policies?

In so many cases, I am afraid, the museum has already pre-selected someone
for a job but either government regulation or museum policy requires that
every vacancy be advertised.  I'd be curious how many museums really do
open their best positions to all who might be qualified/interested....and
then select from that pool without prior familiarity with the applicants.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV