Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jan 1998 09:36:57 +0200 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Comments: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Yes, there's literature on it. I think my references to it are buried in
old e-mail files I cannot now access because of software incompatibilities
(!) -- but ask our collecgues on the VRA list; I think this is where I
encountered the material.
Our policy is: yes, it's obviously harmful, but only cumulatively.
Photographing something once this way is negligible. Repeat = harm. Long
lighting set-ups are cumulative & therefore harmful.
A related problem, in my opinion, is that electronic flash makes for lousy
photographs of paintings. We've had far better results with traditional
lighting, softboxes, time exposures, etc. Being in a studio with strobe
lights gives new meaning to the expression "to shoot" a work of art...
Amalyah
amalyah keshet
head of visual resources, the israel museum, jerusalem
[log in to unmask]
fax: +972-2-670-8064
visit our web page: www.imj.org.il
|
|
|