MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: to encapsulate or not - help!
From:
Timothy Vitale <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Feb 1998 22:39:47 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
I agree that encapsulated material looks very odd on exhibition.  Most
curators and exhibition designer would no doubt agree.  Encapsulation is
for storage and handling.

Dianne van der Reyden of CAL, Smithsonian (301-238-3700  ex 147) did a
great deal of work on the technology and treatment of Victorian era
Valentines, especially fold-out Valentines.

Timothy Vitale
Paper and Photograph Conservator
& Preservation Consultant
Aptos & Felton, CA
408-684-2731 office
408-335-2541 studio afts and eves

ATOM RSS1 RSS2