Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 10 Feb 1998 16:38:32 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Regarding encapsulation of materials on exhibition, I work at a museum that
pretty much encapsulates every paper item that goes on exhibit. We go this
route because the larger items need adequate support and once encapsulated,
a large newspaper or movie poster is rather easy to mount in a case. So
far, we don't seem to have any problems. Sure it takes some getting used
to, for about 5 minutes, but in the long run, the paper is better protected
all the way around, and no visitors have ever complained. And, once an
encapsulated item is removed from display, the encapsulation protects it
while in storage, and makes for easier and safer handling down the road.
Arlyn Danielson
----------
From: Timothy Vitale[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 1998 1:39 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: to encapsulate or not - help!
I agree that encapsulated material looks very odd on exhibition. Most
curators and exhibition designer would no doubt agree. Encapsulation is
for storage and handling.
Dianne van der Reyden of CAL, Smithsonian (301-238-3700 ex 147) did a
great deal of work on the technology and treatment of Victorian era
Valentines, especially fold-out Valentines.
Timothy Vitale
Paper and Photograph Conservator
& Preservation Consultant
Aptos & Felton, CA
408-684-2731 office
408-335-2541 studio afts and eves
|
|
|