Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 14 Apr 1998 15:43:35 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Ellen Giusti
(Exhibition Evaluator; American Museum of Natural History NY; Exhibition
Department)
It is a great program I wish I could attend and learn mor about it:
AN EXHIBIT EVALUATION WORKSHOP
Techniques That Make Exhibits Work Better
but I do not have the time to participate and wish all the success.
But -there is always a nice but (I am a professional BUTTERER):
I visited the AMofNat. History in NY last September. I wonder, if all those
nice techniques of evaluating exhibits are applied in those museum halls.
Or, could it be that the public asked doesnt know the alternatives? Could it
be that the visitors are content just because they havent seen better
displays and just dioramas and rooms filled (stuffed) with objects? Did you
present them with alternatives and they really have chosen that what I saw?
We all want to improve - and we have to.
Greetings,
Peter, the Rebernik
................................
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
| PHAROS International - Bureau for Cultural Projects
| Peter Rebernik, Dipl.-Ing.
| Anton Baumgartner-Str.44/C2/3/2
| A - 1230 Vienna / AUSTRIA
| Tel.: (... 43 1) 667 7375
| Fax: (... 43 1) 667 2984
| Mobiltel.: (... 43 664) 230 2767
| E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
| Homepage: www.ycom.at/~rebernik
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|