MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 7 Jun 1997 08:26:52 +0100
Reply-To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Boylan P <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: Axel Lapp <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (24 lines)
In replying to mine, Axel Lapp of Manchester UK says, amongst other
things:


        "... its disappearance has little to do with the 'siege of
        leningrad', as it was in the castle of kalinigrad, then
        koenigsberg, which until 1945 was a german city."

I think that the reports that the Amber Room was seen in Koenigsberg
sometime between 1993 and late 1944 are quite believable, but that does
not mean that its disappearance "has little to do" with the German
invasion and occupation of Russia.

On the contrary the "Amber Room" was a star feature of a Russian Imperial
Palace 20 km. or so from St. Petersberg (Leningrad) for nearly 2
centuries until the Palace taken over as a military command
headquarters (which was then gutted by deliberate explosions and fires as
the German forces began to retreat), but in Koenigsberg for at the most
about 18 months.

Which is the better claim?

Patrick Boylan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2