At 04:31 PM 7/17/97 -0700, you wrote:
>
>Perhaps the sole reason NY is considered extremely expensive to live in
>is because of the cost of renting an apartment. However, I have friends
>who have gotten incredibly lucky and rent 1 or 2 or 3 room apartments for
>$500-$600. In Manhattan, in the East Village. There are great deals to
>be found here, if you don't mind not living on the Upper East Side.
>
>Besides rent, though, NY is not expensive, relative to other cities I
>have lived near/visited. Food - a range of choices, a range of prices.
>There are more "discount", cheap-o, 10-pairs-of-socks-for-one-dollar
>stores here than possibly anywhere else in the U.S. Finally, I'd rather
>be poor in New York than rich in Idaho, or Indiana, or Iowa.
>
>Yeah, museum/non-profit salaries suck. I know that many of these places
>do not have the money to pay adequate salaries, and that's life. If you
>want to work in this kind of arena, you must accept this. There's no
>point in complaining about it.
>
>
Dear New York Expert-On-Salaries-That-Suck-And-Life-As-It-Is,
I can't understand why you take the position that salaries are bad, museums
don't have the money, and we just have to accept it. It isn't written in
stone that museums/non-profits must pay poorly. I would agree with a
previous poster: Instead of sitting back and taking what we are given,
museum professionals should take a more active role in local and national
debates on cultural institutions and raise awareness of the real value of
our work. Unionize? Who knows? But I would welcome the chance to discuss it.
And, lastly, I would rather live poor in Iowa than rich in New York.
The views expressed are certainly my own.
Peter B. Stevenson
Exhibit Developer
Field Museum/Chicago
[log in to unmask]
"Everywhere is walking distance if you have the time."
--Steven Wright
|