Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Dec 1996 13:29:39 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Organization: |
State Historical Society of Wisconsin |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
JHANDLEY wrote:
> Once again I ask: Why do we as professionals see such things as
> medical coverage as an added benefit? What other profession
> out there does this philosophy transfer to?
Unfortunately, since the American polity has decided over the past 4
years that no one has a fundamental right to medical care, medical
coverage IS by definition an "added benefit." Even in a
union-represented, state service museum curator position in Wisconsin,
one is not entitled to full medical benefits for 6 months. One can
choose to forgo coverage and enroll after 6 months OR one can enroll
within 30 days but pay the full premium oneself for the first 6 months.
Since we're still considered a progressive state in some ways, I'm
hardly surprised that medical coverage elsewhere is worse.
Unfortunately, the fashionable tendency to view medical care as just
another profit-making enterprise will not make it more likely that
museums will be able to improve in this area.
Doug Kendall
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|