MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Harry Needham (Tel 776-8612)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Aug 1996 07:31:22 +0000
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
Jennifer makes a very good point. There is no way that you can ever be
completely sure that you're not accepting tainted money. Indeed, I'd be willing
to bet that there are bloody few major corporations whose hands could be found
to be absolutely squeeky clean over the years - and that undoubtedly applies to
a lot of individuals, too! As Jennifer says, hindsight is a wonderful thing. It
sounds like her institution's sanitization job was very effective, even without
the use of sandblasting.

Harry Needham

ATOM RSS1 RSS2