Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 1 Aug 1996 10:24:39 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Wed, 31 Jul 1996 [log in to unmask] wrote:
> If museums are in fact some how shortchanged in America relative to
> football stadiums, the obvious reason is also the deeper reason: the
> latter moves money around more rapidly than the former. To look more
> deeply for a reason, visual art takes patience and contemplative time
> and abilities, historical artifacts don't yield their beauty and
> meaning quickly and readily. To the degree that we have made museums
> better competitors for leisure (read "family") time dollars, to that
> degree museums have been more significantly rewarded through increased
> funding and visitorship.
>
> I'm sorry, maybe I shouldn't be taking this so seriously, after all,
> its just a post on the internet, but I think that the hypothesis you
> present needs some sharpening and defining.
Wow, Eric, I wish I'd said that. I was *trying* to say that.
Hank Burchard * <[log in to unmask]> * Washington DC | USA
|
|
|