Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jun 1996 07:48:12 EDT |
In-Reply-To: |
note of 06/24/96 18:34 |
Comments: |
Converted from OV/VM to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2X |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Regarding the question about why your registrar was still keeping a bound
accession book when you already have the information on assorted sheets of
paper that were legally binding and/or more comprehensive than the book:
1. Just tradition - the base of the title registrar is, I believe, that
the registrar is the one who keeps the register.
2. Convenient, easy access. The book puts, in place, the major facts
about a string of accessions, whereas the legally binding documents
deal with the exhibits one at a time.
3. This is a variation of 2 (above), but I had an assistant once who
had her own disaster plan. In the event of a fire, fire drill, or
anything that caused us to clear the building quickly, the accession
book was what she would take with her.
I don't think one should spend hours writing extensive descriptions by
hand, but a portable, short summary of what is in the museum could
(knock on wood) be very helpful someday.
|
|
|