Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 20 Nov 1996 09:56:13 +1000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Organization: |
Grey O'Keefe and Associates |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Lynda-
Hi. I am working on a similar project. Please let me know of any info
that comes your way. I'll do the same for you.
Anne-Marie
LyndaK wrote:
>
> We are doing some research at the Australian Museum into quality
> issues, specifically as they relate to exhibitions/public programs.
> As part of this research I would be grateful if you could take a few
> brief minutes to answer the following questions:
>
> 1. List 3 aspects/elements/things that *you* would consider in
> defining quality in museum exhibitions generally. (I am interested in
> what you *personally* think)
>
> 2. What is your area of work (eg design, education, evaluation,
> conservation, curatorial, etc)?
>
> 3. Has your institution done any work in this area?
>
> If there is sufficient interest then I will post the results (but not
> until after January as we'll be conducting the same questionnaire with
> our visitors).
>
> Thanks in advance!
> Lynda Kelly, Eval Coordinator, Australian Museum, Sydney
> [log in to unmask]
|
|
|