Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 1 Nov 1996 09:20:08 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Wow. Its really not so hard after all. Can we end this thread with the
voice of reason prevailing?
**************************************************************************
Mark Nielsen
Exhibit Designer/Preparator
University of Michigan Museum of Art
[log in to unmask] 313/647-2068
On Thu, 31 Oct 1996, patricia l roath wrote:
> I'd like to suggest that everyone pick up a little book titled "The
> Handbood of Nonsexist Writing", by Casey Miller & Kate Swift. A second
> edition came out in 1988 (first published in 1980); there may be
> subsequent editions.
>
> The authors give a historical perspective on the supposedly generic
> masculine that is assumed correct in most English writing. They also
> give easy solutions to such incorrect assumptions for most
> situations--including correspondence.
>
> These issues are larger than simply how we address each other on this
> list--underlying assumptions in language are a crucial consideration
> in catalog writing, gallery labels and text, etc. As with the earlier
> discussion on ethnic bias, gender bias is insidious, obvious to those
> whose sensitivities have been raised, and really quite easy to fix.
>
> Pat Roath
> Elizabeth Sage Historic Costume Collection
> Indiana University, Bloomington
> [log in to unmask]
>
|
|
|