MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
David Haberstich <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Jun 1996 15:12:03 EDT
In-Reply-To:
note of 06/07/96 14:05
Comments:
Converted from OV/VM to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2X
Reply-To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
 Robin Panza certainly is closest to the definition of "kiosk" as
reported in all of the dictionaries I've seen (5 min. research, less
time than it took to read the various guesses and specialized uses). A
Persian kiosk was indeed a small, open pavilion. Although there are some
characteristically Persian styles of kiosk, basically in most English
language usage it's merely a small, open structure--period. Usage or
function is independent, although the AAT definition suggests that the
usage is usually commercial. My edition of AAt places it in the "single built
works by form" hierarchy--between basilicas and lean-tos (what a range).
There are obvious advantages in restricting the word to a building type
in line with its original meaning, rather than trying to infer a
function from it. You can conduct any kind of business in a kiosk or put
anything in it (almost), but to try to restrict it to a specific,
limited function will cause confusion. I'm not sure what people have in
mind by "computer kiosks," but I've seen computer stations that
defininitely were NOT kiosks and weren't IN kiosks. --David Haberstich

ATOM RSS1 RSS2