Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 30 Oct 1996 14:09:06 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Geez. Were getting out of hand here.
I was merely pointing out the most glaring insensitivity in a letter
written by a Russian con-artist begging for money.
I don't know how socialy advanced things are in Russia, but in this
country at least one doesn't generally address the public as 'gentlemen'
-- at least we've come THAT far.
**************************************************************************
Mark Nielsen
Exhibit Designer/Preparator
University of Michigan Museum of Art
[log in to unmask] 313/647-2068
On Wed, 30 Oct 1996, Hank Burchard wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 1996, Leigh Faden wrote:
>
> > Hank Burchard wrote:
> > > I think that using "Gentlemen" as a salutation is harmless, and
> > >suggest that anyone who gets really uptight about it should look inward
> > >rather than outward for the source of distress.
> >
> > Dear Miss Burchard:
> >
> > It amazes me that people who have not experienced life from the
> > feminine side can so easily make pronouncements about whether or not
> > gender-biased or exclusive terms are harmless. If it's harmless, why
> > not all use only feminine pronouns here and let the males see how it feels?
>
> Sorry. I assumed that everyone on the list is a communication
> professional and would read my *whole* message before popping off. Silly
> me.
>
> Hank Burchard * <[log in to unmask]> * Washington DC | USA
>
|
|
|