In a message dated 96-08-02 07:19:53 EDT, [log in to unmask] (Jack Thompson)
writes:

> While I, also, look forward to the results of this research, it will
>  remain a matter of no consequence to me until the data are resolved to a
>  conclusion.  Then, and only then, will I decide to agree or disagree; to
>  do otherwise is to denigrate the research and the researcher.
>
I disagree with your concept, but respect your usage of the personal opinion.
I am in support of Sally's efforts and think Eric and Hank can be as flaming
as they wish as long as they produce valuable points for Sally to think about
as she shapes her work. IMHO, Sally can only benefit from constructive
criticism. Better to get the input as you go along than to finish the work
and find out you were operating from misinformation the whole time (not that
I'm saying she is, it was just an example). I think Sally's thesis has more
value than feminist archaeology and look at the distribution that framework
gets. Keep posting your ideas, Sally. It only hurts for awhile. :-)

- Adrienne