Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jan 1996 08:58:49 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
the "Robber Baron" (no offense; couldn't resist) wrote
snip...
>I wonder whether it is the younger members of museum-l who are more
>interested in breaking it up, and the older ones who would prefer to keep
>it whole.
Could be, but I'm a young'un and I'd like to leave it whole (my masters
program in museum studies took the holistic approach so that may have
something to do with it, too). I do, however, agree with previous
suggestions for us "museumellers":
1) only include the parts of previous messages essential to understanding a
reply
2) short & descriptive subject titles
I know several professionals here and elsewhere who quit this list because
of the volume of material. I know people will always come and go, but I
think we can each take the time to be considerate with our own postings.
As Stan Lee used to say (and maybe he still does): 'Nuff said.
Bill
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
William H. Stirrat (Bill)
Evaluator/Market Researcher ? !
Our Minnesota Science Hall o
Science Museum of Minnesota /( )\
30 East 10th Street /\
St. Paul, MN 55101
[log in to unmask]
As always, opinions expressed are my own.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|