Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 31 Jul 1996 22:33:29 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Sally,
I am not in the least a sports fan - I was never conditioned tobe an
enthusiast - but I am particularly not fond of sports because of the gross
commercialization of sports. BUT... I can't agree with your generalization
here -->
> Here in Milwaukee ........ Breathless, feverish news reports give us
>daily updates on the deal. I'm trying hard to imagine anyone getting this
>excited over building a new MUSEUM here.
But then "here" refering to Milwaukee may be the operative notion.
If you look at the museum scene in other cities, Chicago immediately leaps
to mind - I think that you would find that museums - new museums, in
particular, are heralded as something good, respectable, worthy of support
an admiration - and not gendered. I think the same may be held as true in
other European cities, Cologne, Copenhagen, Bilbao, etc. and certainly all
over Japan - I think its a culture and class thing - not necessarily a
gender thing...
>
>Americans subconsciously cling to the
>mystical ideal of the nuclear family and the male breadwinner.
I don't agree with this at all, but maybe I'm in some kind of a bubble.
Nevertheless, I think it all boils down to the fact that in the schools *in
this country* the arts are the first to go when the budget cuts hit. I
recently moved to New York from Michigan - where the governor - when
inaugurated - made a statement regarding his personal education in the arts
- it turns out that his mother decorated cakes and made crotched doilies.
Upon becoming governor - he slashed the state support to the biggest arts
institution in Michigan (the Detroit Institute of Arts) and held his
inaugural ball at the museum - mixed messages, huh? But the point is - the
man never had any arts education - didn't/doesn't have a clue about
art/arts education/museums. The good news is that the community rallied
behind the museum and the board (mostly men, true, but with a good
smattering of women) raised the money to keep the place alive and healthy -
the biggest chunk of change towards the funding campaign came from
individuals and families - not corporations. As Eric suggested ( and as I
trust will happen anyway) you need to hone your arguments. But good luck!
Its a long road!
Suzanne Quigley (my opinion)
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|