MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: For Adrienne and Jay: Relevance; Controversy; etc. (Long Post)
From:
Adrienne DeArmas <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Jun 1996 11:55:57 -0400
Reply-To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
In a message dated 96-06-21 01:13:41 EDT, [log in to unmask] writes:

<< The Vermeer exhibition did
 quite well at the National Gallery of Art and in Holland with minimal (if
 any) controversy; some people are repelled by controversy.   >>

Ah, but there was controversy! At least at the National Gallery, because the
show was so important, museum donors and benefactors hired their own security
people to staff it during the federal shutdown. See, Positive controversy!

- Adrienne

ATOM RSS1 RSS2