Michelle, I thought that your proverbial 2 cents were very fine, with
one exception. I don't think that its true that [paraphrase, my email
doesn't do quotes] "museums, particularly in this country, are public
institutions." In my experience, museums, particularly in this
country, are private institutions, which function with decreasingly
significant public support.
Now, these institutions have a public mandates, usually by charter,
mission, and other things (like IRS determination of nfp status), but
the boards are decidedly private, and they are the final arbiters of
museum policy. Even in the instances where museums are public, like LA
County Museum or Detroit Institute of Art, private funding and private
board membership are the norm. The Smithsonian, of course, is an
exceptions, which is where the Enola Gay controversy get's kinda fuzzy
in my mind.
This contrasts pretty distinctly with museums throughout Europe and, I
think, most of the world, where the institution tends to be publicly
funded and operated.
I don't know that this really has a tremendous impact on the
exhibition and interpretation decisions that museums make, but the
difference is there.
Eric Siegel
[log in to unmask]
|