Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - MUSEUM-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
MUSEUM-L Home MUSEUM-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
NEH votes.
From:
Andy Finch <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Jun 1996 16:18:52 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
1)  By a wide margin -- about 80 votes --  the House defeated the Shadegg
amendment to cut NEH by a further $12 million.  They haven't voted on
final passage of the interior appropriations bill yet, but we anticipate no
more amendments on the cultural agencies.

2)  In response to a question:

Rep. Regula (chair of interior approps subcommittee) told the House that
the committee intends to stand by the leadership agreement reached last
year, which called for eliminating the NEA *after* FY 1997 and NEH after
1998.  In order to actually eliminate the agency(ies), the House would
have to so vote *next* year (regarding NEA) and the following year for
NEH. In other words, it really doesn't matter very much what Mr. Regula
says today, because the crux will be in the next Congress.

Sorry for Beltway talk -- just yell if I am being unintelligible.

Andy Finch
[log in to unmask]
AAM Government Affairs

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV