MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Patricia W. Strong" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Sep 1995 23:11:54 +0400
Reply-To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Mr. Wittle,

I think that an ad for the instructional tech. should be allowed but the
person erred by being much too verbose.  I see nothing wrong with a short
succinct announcement with an address to respond for more particulars.

Thems that don't ask, don't get.
Pat Strong
[log in to unmask]




>Eric, I remember you advising commercial firms that they could shill on
>the list.  I think by the same token, iddividuals should be able to
>"advertise."  There was much positive discussion about the need of the
>museum community for access to info about people and services.  Mr.
>Taylor's post was well within those bounds.
>
>On Thu, 14 Sep 1995, Eric Siegel wrote:
>
>>      btaylor, who didn't sign your "message." What you posted is
>>      grossly inappropriate for this list. One thing you certainly
>>      haven't learned in your long resume, I mean life, is the polite,
>>      considerate, appropriate use of the Internet.
>>
>>      Eric Siegel
>>      [log in to unmask]
>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2